PhD defense “Voicing the Invisibles. Investigating Impacts of Resettlement on Riverine Women due to the Construction of Belo Monte Hydropower Dam”

On November 1, 2024, Satya Maia Patchineelam defended her PhD thesis at Erasmus University Rotterdam, entitled “Voicing the Invisibles. Investigating Impacts of Resettlement on Riverine Women due to the Construction of Belo Monte Hydropower Dam”. The Belo Monte Hydropower dam, constructed in the Xingu River, resettled many riverine families from their homes on the riverbanks to the outskirts of the city of Altamira, Brazil. The lack of transparency and participation reduced the chances of the riverine community to maintain their riverine culture and river-based livelihoods. The research aimed to understand the impact of resettlement on the livelihood of the riverine women and how it has affected their traditions. This research answered the central question: What are the various effects of resettlement and disconnection from the river on the riverine women? The study makes part of the River City Network, sister alliance of Riverhood and River Commons. The latter’s PI Prof. Rutgerd Boelens acted as a committee member. During the research, Satya has joined several Riverhood and River Commons meetings in Wageningen, Manizales, and a  methodology workshop on counter-mapping with CEDLA at the University of Amsterdam. The learnings were applied in the field study’s participatory action-research.

 

Defense of PhD thesis “The Politics of Place and the Place of Politics. Large hydropower dam contestations in Sikkim, India”

Rinchu Doma Dukpa, from Darjeeling, India defended her PhD thesis titled “The Politics of Place and the Place of Politics. Large hydropower dam contestations in Sikkim, India” on the 8th of October 2024 at Omnia Auditorium, Wageningen University. Her thesis is based on the local conflicts, contestations and social movements arising from the development of large dams on the headwaters of River Teesta in Sikkim. The PhD thesis was supervised by Riverhood / River Commons researchers Prof. Rutgerd Boelens, Dr. Jaime Hoogesteger and Dr. Gert Jan Veldwisch. The thesis elaborates on many of the core political ecology conceptualizations of the two river projects.

Hydropower development in India is highly contested, conflicted and controversial, though often framed as bringing prosperity and wealth. India’s water abundant states in the Eastern Himalaya, of which Sikkim is one, have experienced a burgeoning of large dam development after the economic liberalization of the country in 1991-92. Large dam constructions in the Sikkim Himalaya are solely for electricity generation to be transferred to power-deficit states across India. The thesis investigated the ‘politics of place’ and the ‘place of politics’ arising out of the conundrum of variegated local responses to government-driven large hydropower development in the headwaters of Teesta River in Sikkim. Through qualitative, multi-sited ethnographic research, the thesis examined local actions and mobilizations around dams, ranging from a persistently strong opposition to a perceived willingness to negotiate with the government and complete silence by individuals and communities in the North District of Sikkim. It shows how spatial contradiction invoked by large dams resulted in unique place-based struggles for identity and power that (re)shape territories, protest movements and contestations. The thesis has argued that the responses to dams are influenced by the diverse socio-cultural, politico-economic and historical contexts of the place, the people and the place-people relationships that are traversed in and with power.

Presentation of the documentary “Rivers in Movement: Following the Voice of the People” at the Dutch Design Week

On 25 October, postdoctoral researcher Daniele Tubino de Souza presented the short documentary ‘Rivers in Movement: Following the Voice of the People” at the Dutch Design Week, in Eindhoven. This was part of the Equity Dialogues at DDW, which focused on storytelling as a participatory form of sharing lived experiences. In this edition, the Equity Dialogues sought to amplify the voices of those directly affected by our designs by telling their stories through mini-documentaries. The purpose was to showcase the voices of under-represented groups and highlight the need for their inclusion in the design of solutions to issues that impact our everyday lives. The documentaries and presentations during the session emphasised the value of personal stories informed by other forms of knowledge.

The short documentary produced by the Riverhood and River Commons team, “Rivers in Movement: Following the Voice of the People’, presents the multiple voices with which the river activist researchers of these projects are in dialogue, and reveals the ontologies through which we view rivers and tell us how to live and coexist with them, fight for them, and co-design action research strategies. These voices, set against a large 50 metre long map representing people’s experiences, perspectives, struggles and visions for the future of rivers, inspire us to unite and fight for rivers.

The coffee cooperative

By Balthazar Sellier (Master students exchange programme, cohort of 2024-2025)

It is 9 a.m., and I am sitting in a panaderia enjoying my first coffee of the day after a cold 3-hour drive from Victoria. In front of me, the interactions are fast, and movements come one after another as the chivas arrive non-stop. In this street of Pensilvania, a large village of Caldas, Colombia, two agricultural cooperatives are receiving coffee bags from these colourful trucks. The rich, detailed drawings of the chivas captured my attention. On an often rusty wood, lines and geometric forms going from red to blue, passing by green, pink, or orange, make them unique. As soon as one is seen around the corner, the rhythm of the street gets activated in the twinkling of an eye. Peasants, arriving in groups, are coming out of the chiva, which is just parked on half of the street. The coteros – a person working in a coffee cooperative- unload the coffee bags, pilling up to 80, overflowing this truck. The mechanism is on. Poncho over the shoulder to soften the rustic character of the bags, the coteros are handing them in a rapid and agile manner. The coffee is stocked in the back shop of the cooperative, where they are exchanged for around 70.000-80.000 COP the bag. It will then be sent to Manizales, where it will be exported internationally. In the space of two hours, six chivas came in. All of them had already left, except for the last one of the morning, unloading its shipment for an hour. The other coteros are waiting and chatting in front of the cooperative. They explained to me that around a dozen people work there, receiving coffee deliveries throughout the day. At times, the chivas fill the entire street, stacking up and amplifying the lively rhythm of the scene. Initially, I felt hesitant to take photos of the streets and the people who give them such vibrancy. After all, this is not my culture, and the boundaries of context and personal privacy can sometimes feel unclear. However, every person I asked gave an enthusiastic yes, proud of their work and appreciative of the interest it sparked.

Coffee and cacao play a vital role in the peasantry tapestry of the region. In the more uphill places, like those in Pensilvania, coffee is the primary crop, while cacao thrives in warmer, downhill areas such as Victoria. As drinking coffee has never been easier and ubiquitous in many Western countries, this economy relies on the work of several actors at the “bottom of the chain”. From the peasant to the cotero, and the seller, the cultivation of cacao and coffee plants sustains families and villages all over Caldas. The vibrant chivas bustling through the streets, carrying goods and people, are a visible testament to this way of life. Yet, perhaps the most profound cultural legacy lies in the role coffee plays in bringing people together. Whether it’s a morning ritual, an afternoon pause, or an excuse for a late-night discussion, coffee has a unique way of assembling people, fostering connection, and enriching daily life.

MACO at the COP16 on biodiversity

By Balthazar Sellier (Master students exchange programme, cohort of 2024-2025)

Our common journey starts in Cali, the capital of biodiversity for ten days as it hosts the COP16.

It’s 11 a.m. when my phone rings. It’s Javier. He tells me they are already at the meeting point and that I should be there in 30 minutes. I’m still folding fifty sheets of political notes into thirds on the wooden table of a youth hostel in San Antonio. I need to hurry. The most important meeting of my research awaits just a kilometre away: MACO at COP16. I down the rest of my coffee in one gulp, tidy up the mess, and head out into Cali’s already hot and bustling streets. I had been both dreading and anticipating this event. A COP feels monumental to a young student full of utopian dreams. Witnessing the conferences from the inside, being in those spaces where people deeply committed—sometimes despite themselves—to biodiversity protection for years is exciting. Moreover, I was not there just as a student but as a “researcher,” driven by the critical goal of making a difference.

There they are—a group of five people seated at a café across from the building where the event would occur. I don’t hesitate for a second; I know it’s MACO. The way they sit with a casual ease reflects their authenticity. Then I recognise Javier; he wears a white polo shirt adorned with the MACO logo, and on the back, the full name is spelt out: Movimiento Ambiental de los Campesinos del Oriente de Caldas. The welcome is warm. We introduce ourselves quickly, and the conversation I had interrupted picks up again with renewed vigour. We sit in a circle on plastic chairs at the small café. Javier, MACO’s president, is deep in discussion with Viviana Berra, the president of the ecofeminist movement EcoGenova and coordinator of the Red Nacional contra las PCHs project. James, the eldest of the group, participates enthusiastically, his voice carrying a strong conviction tinged with emotion. Lastly, two other men, peasants from Pennsylvania and Samana, complete the group.

The excitement rises as we left the café, crossing the street to the venue. That intense hour of discussion flies by, and Viviana, speaking French to me, confides that she hasn’t had time to eat. We enter the building, bypassing the queue like VIPs. We are the delegation set to speak at COP16, and I am part of it. It’s 1:45 p.m. when the event finally begins. We decorate the starkly white room with posters and large banners covering half the wall space, bringing a bit more warmth to the space. One of the banners is a drawing from a “counter-mapping” workshop held months earlier, depicting the territory of eastern Caldas as envisioned by the peasants. Green fields and blue rivers stand out vividly on this map, underscoring the significance of nature and biodiversity—a theme that would resonate throughout the three speeches.

The room is filled with about fifty people. I distribute the policy note written especially for the COP, titled: “Small Hydropower: Breaking the Myth of the False Green Energies”. Writing for this event was a great opportunity to join MACO and the others directly in the resistance and get involved firsthand. Beyond its informative value, the note reflects my engagement, which is crucial for building trustful relationships.

Viviana speaks first, her tone calm yet confident. She delivers her talk at an impressive speed, clearly well-versed in her topic. The audience, trying their best to keep up, is captivated by her ease with the microphone as she moves across the stage. In just a few minutes, she lays out the context, diving into the devastating impact of small hydroelectric plants—PCHs (in Spanish), the conference’s central theme. Her presentation is filled with factual accounts, supported by studies and references to Colombia’s constitution, painting a grim picture of how peasant knowledge and aspirations are swept aside by these multimillion-dollar projects rife with corruption. “You have five fingers, and they cut off four,” she says, describing the dramatic drying up of rivers caused by PCHs. James speaks next. He used a few slides, and his voice reflected a deeply personal narrative. He speaks slowly, leaving long pauses that fill the room with a heavy silence, where only the echoes of his last words linger, leaving us with a profound sense of the enormity of his lifelong struggle. At one point, James reads a poem about water. The audience, initially surprised, quickly connects with the raw emotion. His message is clear: we must reconnect with our emotions to grasp the plight of these peasant communities. Finally, Javier takes the stage. By then, the session is nearing its end, and the room buzzes with movement as people enter and exit noisily. Javier’s speech contrasts sharply with James’s measured pace. His delivery is urgent and impassioned, his voice rising and breaking with emotion. He doesn’t move much, his intensity anchoring him in place. His words are raw, reflecting the struggles of a peasant turned into an advocate of a resistance movement. He conveyed the weight of years of fighting, with survival as the only possible outcome. Javier’s speech is filled with passion, carrying the authenticity of a man deeply connected to the cause.

After being pushed to the exit, we gather on the sidewalk, the tension finally easing. Everyone agrees—the event is a success. Smiling broadly, Viviana, Javier, and the others were thrilled. “It’s human to feel emotions,” James tells me, reflecting on his memorable speech. Two of the peasants, heading off to grab a bite, confide that it is their first time attending an event of this magnitude. Reflecting on the “COP de la gente” etiquette, their peasant norms and codes contrast slightly with the institutional setting. But their authenticity, though unintentional, shines through, making their contributions heartfelt and unique. MACO had left its mark on the event, shaping it in its image.

The life in Caldas is great and calm, however threatened

By Balthazar Sellier (Master students exchange programme, cohort of 2024-2025)

My name is Balthazar Sellier, and I am 23 years old and a student in the international development research master’s programme at the University of Amsterdam. Thanks to the Riverhood and River Commons initiative, I am currently in Caldas, a department in the centre of Colombia, pursuing research on the relationships between peasants and the rivers. More specifically, I dive into the threat of hydroelectric projects to the meanings and values of rivers among peasants. The thesis enters the works of Ana Arbelaez-Trujillo, who launched the project here already two years ago.

For a few weeks, I am conducting my research here in Victoria, a village situated in the east of Caldas, Colombia. Like many other villages in Colombia, a central square gathers people in cafés and bars surrounding it with a church on the side. This square is even more splendid by the majestic ceiba, dressed in the middle by its 144-year-old. The music coming out of the bars mixes with the birds singing. The life is great and calm. However, it is constantly threatened by an underlying and persisting risk: hydroelectrical projects.

The eastern of Caldas overflows with water as several rivers flow within this region’s hills. Therefore, the government has made it its playground for developing hydroelectrical projects over the rivers. The project Miel I, which was the biggest dam in Colombia at that time, has submerged houses and disturbed ecosystems. It is still very present in the collective imagination of the inhabitants here, even more than 20 years later. The primary people affected are the peasants. By cultivating coffee, cacao, plantains and a variety of other vegetables and fruits on a small scale, maintaining an intimate connection to their surrounding ecosystem. Rivers drying up, the decline in food population, and deforestation caused by the construction of hydroelectric projects jeopardise not only their livelihoods but also the region’s biodiversity and, by extension, the well-being of the entire community.
A new hydroelectrical project revived these fears. Miel II, a run-of-river, is designed to supply Miel I with water. Miel II plans to be located in eastern Caldas, in the municipalities of Samaná, Marquetalia, and Victoria, along the La Miel River tributary – an area inhabited by peasant communities. The project is supposed to dig a long tunnel in the mountains to fill the turbines with more water and, therefore, energy. Recently, the project lost its environmental license, halting its construction. This situation stems from the persistent efforts of water justice movements, which have mobilised local inhabitants to stand against the threats to their livelihoods and environment. Movimiento Ambiental Campesino del Oriente de Caldas (MACO), created in 2015, is one of the main resistance organisations. Working closely with them, I am here to understand the local context better and speak with the peasants to grasp their feelings and experiences firsthand. By gathering these insights, we could shape a (new) narrative – one that highlights who the peasants truly are, the challenges they face because of the commodification of water and the profound significance the river holds for them. Moreover, other organisations are proposing environmentally sustainable alternatives, such as eco-tourism for Coporacion Viglas Ambientales de Victoria, and cross-generational pedagogy programmes for EcoVictoria. Therefore, through telling their stories, supported by a photographic journey I would lead, we could underscore the critical importance of protecting rivers.

Struggles and Hope in the Páramos

By Sanne Kroezen (Master students exchange programme, cohort of 2024-2025)

Introduction

My name is Sanne Kroezen Peña, I am a Dutch-Ecuadorian MSc student of Law and Society at Leiden University. Currently, I am in Ecuador to conduct fieldwork for my thesis on local perceptions of water justice in the communities along the Guarguallá and Alao rivers, in collaboration with the Observatorio Politecnico del Agua of the ESPOCH university. I would like to take you along different perespectives on justice I encountered in the paramos of Guarguallá.

Attitudes in the páramos

From Licto, it took us a 1.5-hour drive uphill to reach the páramos of Guarguallá. The páramos are high-altitude ecosystems in the Andes, known for their cold climate, unique vegetation, and vital role in water supply and biodiversity. The páramos are essential for providing fresh water to millions of people, but face threats from climate change, agriculture, mining, and unsustainable land use, which endanger their ecological balance and water supply functions.

As we ascended, the landscape gradually transformed: the air grew colder, and signs of human habitation diminished. Fewer houses dotted the landscape, agriculture became sparse, and the architecture appeared simpler. Occasionally, we spotted alpacas grazing on the rugged terrain. Along the way, we picked up three local men for an interview we had arranged.

These men have spent their entire lives in the páramos, which they call home. They now serve on the board of ASARATY, a local organization that oversees the management of alpacas in these fragile ecosystems. During our conversation, deep frustrations emerged, rooted in the injustices they endure. They feel unheard, overlooked, and abandoned by both the government and the downstream communities that rely on the páramos’ water supply. The scarcity of employment opportunities further compounds their struggles. The páramos are vital for water, yet their delicate nature prohibits livestock grazing and crop cultivation, leaving these men feeling as though they have been left with nothing. Our discussion was charged with intense emotions: anger, sadness, disappointment, and a profound sense of distrust. They believe they have sacrificed much to protect the páramos and feel they deserve recognition and support in return. Ultimately, these men have adopted a “wait-and-see” approach, worn down by years of neglect.

A few weeks later, I had the chance to speak with another resident of the páramos. Pedro* is a former community leader and ex-president of ASARATY, who is now collaborating with the ESPOCH to produce alpaca wool products, together with other residents from the páramos (see photo). He presented a stark contrast to the previous group. In an area plagued by poverty, Pedro’s resilience and determination stood out. While he acknowledges the injustices faced by his people, he refuses to wait for others to solve their problems. The páramos is his home, and he cherishes the fresh air and natural beauty, which fuels his drive to protect it. Rather than waiting for change, Pedro has taken action with the alpaca wool production initiative.

Witnessing such a positive, forward-thinking perspective amidst the surrounding adversity is truly inspiring. Despite the challenges and angry neighbors, Pedro remains optimistic. As he says, Ecuador is a beautiful country with endless opportunities, and it’s up to each individual to make the most of them.

*Name changed for privacy reasons

 

Sannes field work in Chimborazo, Ecuador

By Sanne Kroezen (Master students exchange programme, cohort of 2024-2025)

Introduction

My name is Sanne Kroezen Peña, I am a Dutch-Ecuadorian MSc student of Law and Society at Leiden University. Currently, I am in Ecuador to conduct fieldwork for my thesis on local perceptions of water justice in the communities along the Guarguallá and Alao rivers, in collaboration with the Observatorio Politecnico del Agua of the ESPOCH university.

Expectations

As a half-Ecuadorian, I was already quite familiarized with the Ecuadorian nature, culture, language and food. I was born in Quito, and I have returned with some regularity to the country. But still, the varied nature, with mountains and jungle side by side, the delicious (and cheap) food, and the friendly people keep surprising me again as if it’s the first time I see it. However, living somewhere for 3 months and doing research is very different from holidays.

During my preparations in the Netherlands, I tried to imagine what my time in Riobamba and the communities would be like…: “I would have to do everything by bus or cab, not by bike like in Amsterdam.” “Lunch would consist of a three-course meal, instead of a simple cheese sandwich.” “I will probably also have to eat cuy (guinea pig) while I’m there.” “The weather would be a lot nicer than the rainy Netherlands…”

Now that I have been here for over a month, these expectations all turned out to be true (I have even tasted cuy).

Also, I expected academic differences and differences with regards to the student-life. This, however, was more similar than I had expected. Only, the views from the ESPOCH campus are a bit more breathtaking than from Leiden University or the WUR, with several volcanos in the background.

Life in Riobamba and Licto

After a 24-hour trip from Amsterdam, I arrived in Quito, the bruising capital of the country. I got to live in the cheerful Ecuadorian culture again. After a week of settling in Quito, I arrived at Riobamba, located in the center of Ecuador. A colorful city surrounded by the Chimborazo, Tungurahua and more volcanoes. There is a lot of life on the streets of Riobamba with countless cafes, restaurants and bars. The street scenes vary every block, with traditionally clothed women selling food on the market and a supermarket in a big mall in the next street. Riobamba illustrates the rich culture of Ecuador and showed me how the communitarian lives interact with the city life.

Although my thesis focuses on the communities outside the city, like Licto and Pungala, my home-basis is in Riobamba, as there are many actors living in Riobamba and many ESPOCH-events to attend. However, I visit Licto several times a week and have a room there with a warm family.

The first time I arrived in Licto, I felt like I was entering another world. Where I blended in so easily in Riobamba, I stood out here in the village. As I moved away from the main square, the streets turned from tiles into earth. I visited the feria full of pigs, guinea pigs, chickens and other animals. Suddenly, I felt not local anymore, as I did feel in Riobamba, attracting stares by not wearing the traditional clothing (and by wearing a camera around my neck). And that whilst Licto is only 30 minutes away from Riobamba.

The second time in Licto, the local culture was even more visible. After a meeting at the Guarguallá-Licto irrigation system, I had the special opportunity to join them to the local festivities of Licto, which started with a beautiful parade on the streets of Licto. All the surrounding communities participated in the parade with local dances, clothing, and music, all in their own style.

Currently, I am enjoying the switch between the city-life in Riobamba and the village-life of Licto, while conducting interviews and participant observation (eg. at the minga).

The ‘Pensar con los Ríos la Paz Ambiental’ project, co-led by Riverhood and River Commons, concluded in the summer of 2024

By: Ana María Arbeláez-Trujillo

The defense of rivers in Colombia is as diverse as their geographies, waters, and communities. From grassroots actions to court rulings granting legal rights to rivers, riparian communities employ a range of strategies to protect their rivers. These approaches are shaped by regional histories, socio-cultural contexts, and the impacts of various national and international actors involved in water governance.
Between June 2023 and July 2024, the Thinking with Rivers for Environmental Peacebuilding project (in Spanish: Pensar con los Ríos la Paz Ambiental) supported the co-creation of socio-legal strategies across four river basins in the Colombian Andes: the La Miel River in Caldas, the Sogamoso River in Santander, and the Cauca and Dormilón Rivers in Antioquia. These regions face environmental degradation alongside the dynamics of Colombia’s internal armed conflict, which has persisted since the early 20th century. As a result, resolving these conflicts is closely tied to the peacebuilding aspirations of the riverine communities.

Throughout the eleven months of the project, riverine communities and grassroots movements from these four rivers engaged in collaborative learning experiences with other river movements, academics, lawyers, and like-minded allies.

The project specifically organized four knowledge exchange workshops in each of the participating rivers, with about 50 people involved. Additionally, three macro-basin meetings took place, bringing together representatives from each river on three separate occasions in the cities of Medellín and Manizales. As part of the initiative, public events were held in both cities. These included the participation of four women leaders at the Book and Culture Festival in Medellín as well as the involvement of four grassroots leaders and academics in a roundtable at the international event ‘Ríos en Movimiento’. These spaces gave visibility to their struggles and provided them with opportunities to identify spaces for cooperation.

Photo 1: Roundtable with riverine leaders at the “Moving Rivers” international conference in Manizales. Credit: Johan Sebastian Silva G. (2024)

Photo 2: Final event of the ‘Thinking with Rivers’ initiative in Medellín. Leaders of the four rivers and academics walked along the upstream areas of the Medellín River and the city in a pedagogic exercise to connect with the river on its different phases. Credit: Pensar con los Ríos (2024)

As part of the project’s activities, Carlos Andrés Zapata Cardona visited Wageningen University. He is the president of the Instituto Popular de Capacitación in Colombia and a member of the advisory team for the implementation of the court ruling that declared the Cauca River a subject of rights. In his talk, he shared with an international audience the challenges of implementing river rights decisions in a context of extractivism and armed conflict.

Photos 3 and 4: Presentation entitled “Are rivers subjects or rights or common goods under special protection?” by Carlos Andrés Zapata. Credit: Laura Giraldo-Martínez. (2023)

Furthemore, Riverhood led the organization of a two-day meeting titled “Community Economies with the Rivers: How do we build an agro-diverse biocultural eastern Caldas?” This event, co-organized with the Movimiento Ambiental Campesino del Oriente de Caldas – MACO, brought together peasant men and women, fishermen, bird watchers, cultural and rural tourism promoters, and members of grassroots collectives defending the La Miel river. The goal of this River co-learning activity was to reflect on how these grassroots actors envision the future of their rivers and territories, how they perceive the cultural and natural richness of their land, the current initiatives for territorial defense, and the threats they identify to their well-being. The methodology used to reflect on their perspectives and collective experiences was social cartography. The research team prepared four maps and asked participants to draw on them to answer these key questions.

Photos 5,6,7 and 8: Day one of the meeting – social cartography workshop in Samaná. Credit: Ana María Arbeláez-Trujillo

The drawings and ideas shared by the participants in this workshop served as input for the creation of an artwork that reflects their vision for the future of eastern Caldas as a “Biocultural Agro-Diverse Territory.” This piece was created by local artist Rafael Rodríguez, also known as RaRo Acuarelas.

Photo 9: Oriente de Caldas Biocultural Agrodiverso. Credit: RaRo Acuarelas

On the second day of the meeting, we visited the La Miel River and participated in a river walk for bird-watching with the local group “Falcons de Oriente.” During this walk, we discussed the various bird species native to eastern Caldas and explored how bird-watching tourism could support rural economies. Emphasizing the potential of these grassroots-led initiatives is essential in proposing alternatives to mainstream development models.

Photos 10, 11, 12, and 13: Day 2 of the meeting – River walk and bird watching activity. Credit:Ana María Arbeláez-Trujillo

We concluded the day by swimming in the river, and listening to the diverse life stories and experiences of various people living along the La Miel River basin. This river co-learning activity brought together participants from peasant and fisher communities, bird watchers, cultural and rural tourism promoters, and urban environmental collectives, many of whom were meeting for the first time. As a result, it was an enriching space for exchanging knowledge, learning from new experiences, and exploring alternative proposals for community-based economies in eastern Caldas.

The project Pensar con los Ríos la Paz Ambiental aimed to contribute to the broader goals of the Riverhood and River Commons initiatives, which focus on creating bridges between academia and social movements, fostering cooperation among grassroots collectives, and supporting the New Water Justice Movements defending rivers. The Riverhood and River Commons projects collaborated with this initiative through the participation of doctoral researchers Ana María Arbeláez (La Miel River) and Moritz Tenthoff (Cauca River), in cooperation with Professor Denisse Roca of the University of Antioquia, who is  the principal investigator of the project.

Acknowledgement:

Pensar con los Ríos la Paz Ambiental was co-funded by the Colombo-German Institute for Peace (CAPAZ) and carried out in collaboration with four community collectives, the Pontifical Bolivarian University,  the Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems (IRI THESys) of Humboldt University, the Claretiana University Foundation, the NGO Instituto Popular de Capacitación, and the Socio-Legal Clinic of Public Interest at the University of Caldas.

The riverine communities of the Rio Guarguallá: What happened after the countermap session?

By Maartje Claassens (Master students exchange programme, cohort of 2024-2025)

Since my last two updates, a lot has happened here in Ecuador. I have been here for more than three months now with only one more month to go, time flies! In these last weeks, I have had the luck to meet so many friendly people, who have welcomed me with open arms. As I slowly built up a little network, I had the opportunity to attend reunions, events, and asambleas, talk to many different people, and live with a family in the páramo for a while. I still learn more about my thesis subject and Ecuadorian people, culture, and life everyday!

As I have told you before, my thesis dives into the relationships between the upstream and downstream communities of the Guarguallá River basin. You may wonder how we came up with the idea to explore the social ties around this river, well known locally but which can´t even be found on the internet. Well, my thesis draws upon the issues that came out of the countermap session organised by Riverhood & River Commons in the Guarguallá River basin last year. You may have read Sebastián´s story on this website, in which he describes how the riverine communities, academics, activists, and artists came together to create a map of the river basin. Or you may have seen this mapping process in the impressive (and Global Impact Award winning) documentary ‘Diary of Travelling Rivers’, also on this website. On the map, you can find the river and the small streams that feed it, the endless grasslands in the páramo, the alpacas, the communities who take care of the páramo, the irrigation system of Guarguallá-Licto, and the communities who benefit from the water in Licto. However, a countermap is not only the visualisation of a territory. It is also a way to build relationships, share histories, and express frustrations, needs, hopes, or wishes.

While the riverine communities live relatively close to each other and are related to the same river, they do not have a close relationship. The downstream communities in Licto use the water from the river to irrigate their lands, which has literally revitalized this impoverished area. While the battle for water has been hard in Licto, the indigenous peasant communities can now produce various kinds of vegetables, fruits, grains, and herbs and hold cattle. Since the construction of the Guarguallá-Licto irrigation system, the downstream communities established relationships based on the Andean principle of `reciprocity´ with the upstream communities in the páramo. The communities in Licto used to provide maize to the páramo communities, to secure the conservation of the water sources they depend upon. The communities in the páramo have been dedicated to the conservation of the páramo these last years, with the support of various NGOs and state institutions. However, the relationship between the riverine communities slowly disappeared over the years due to various reasons. CESA, the NGO that initially supported the riverine communities in their contact, left, new leaders have been elected on both sides, and younger generations are not aware of the battle for water in Licto. In the countermap session, it came to the fore that the páramo communities feel frustrated about the distance between the riverine communities. While they have been dedicated to the conservation of the water sources from which the downstream communities benefit, they do not receive anything in return.

Now, more than a year after the countermap session, I believe that there is new hope for the revitalization of the relationship between the riverine communities. In fact, the seed for this renewed contact may even be planted at the countermap session! In October, the páramo caretaker association, ASARATY, visited the irrigation board in Licto. A part of the road in the páramo had been destroyed by a landslide, which is also of importance for the downstream communities as it is close to the irrigation system. For this reason, the leaders of ASARATY came to ask for support in the form of machinery, materials, credit or hands to restore the road. However, the visit was not only intended to ask for one-time support but also to discuss how a more permanent collaboration could take form. ASARATY invited the irrigation board to visit the páramo, to see where their water comes from and what the communities do to protect the water sources. It was the first time that this board visited the páramo, the first time in a while they spoke openly with each other about how their relationship could be revitalized, and therefore an important milestone in my opinion. The leaders concluded that water is life, and therefore, that it is crucial to take care of the water sources. To achieve this, the upstream and downstream communities have to collaborate. After the tour in the páramo, the board presented their proposal to support ASARATY with the restoration of the road in their asamblea. After a discussion with the representatives from the communal irrigation committees in Licto, the board proposed to ASARATY to provide the cement needed and to come and help with the construction in mingas. In the future, the water users may offer support to the páramo caretakers in the form of machinery, materials, or hands for other wished-for projects in the páramo, such as the construction of a road and irrigation infrastructure. How this collaboration will precisely take form still needs to be discussed, and put on paper so that the relationship won’t disappear when new leaders are elected. Nonetheless, I believe that the first steps are made and I am more than curious to explore how their relationship will develop in the future!

Life in the Ecuadorian páramo

By Maartje Claassens (Master students exchange programme, cohort of 2024-2025)

Do you remember that Susana and Sebastián invited me to join them to Guamote for a workshop? Today we went back to visit the communities and their land. During the workshop, we heard a lot of stories about how the communities organise their water and what problems they face. However, seeing it with your own eyes says even more, and so we returned!

The morning started very Ecuadorian, which means very early, but without any rush. A little later than planned Susana, Sebastián, and I left Riobamba and then again, a little later than planned, the people from Guamote arrived quietly at the village square to take us to their communities. Todo tranquilo! We first visited a páramo whose land belonged to one of the four communities we would visit today. What an incredible landscape! We drove along dirt roads, which were barely roads, to where their water comes from. A páramo actually works like sponge: capturing and holding water and then slowly releasing it, creating small water streams. As the community is growing, more households need water which especially becomes a problem when it is as dry as it is now. Therefore, the community decided to start taking better care of their water sources (the páramo). This means that native plant species were sowed and that cattle is not allowed in these areas anymore. As a result, the páramo here is now in much better condition, and they also hope to start developing community-based tourism in the area in the future, to generate some extra income.

Sebastián also took a sample at each water source to measure the water quality. It is so special how clean the water is here, because it is naturally filtered by the páramo and is not contaminated with poo from cattle or pesticides. We continued our way to two communities further down the road, which were completely different again. Their land did not belong to the páramo, as they were located a bit lower in the mountains and used the water from the páramo which reaches them through the retention basins and water pipes. The water is mainly used in the household and for drinking, as there are no irrigation systems in this region yet.

On our way to the last community, we were briefly held up by a pile of sand dumped just in front of a house. The women were working hard to shovel the road clear for us. But as Sebastián said, ‘I think it is time to get involved in the minga!’ In these areas, reciprocity is the basis of community and can be understood as ‘you help me, I help you’. To receive water or to be a comunero, you have to be involved and work. So, time to roll up our own sleeves! In the photo you can see the proof of my first contribution to the minga. How reciprocity takes form in Andean communities is also an important part of my thesis, and how could you learn more than becoming part of it yourself right?

Arriving at the final páramo, we once again enjoyed the beautiful scenery and listened to the stories of the communities. What an interesting day this was, and what differences there are here in short distances! People live quite a simple life here, as it revolves around the land, livestock, and community. There is no internet, only dirt roads, and barely any cars, which makes the connection with the rest of the world difficult. However, a simple life is not an easy life, because the people work incredibly hard and with the drought of recent times, it remains to be seen whether their harvests will succeed.

Speaking about drought – it has not been raining for a while now in Ecuador, which is quite a problem in a country that mainly depends on hydroelectricity. Last week, electricity was cut off in the entire country for a night. However this week, the government decided to take even stricter measures. In some parts of Riobamba (such as mine), we have no electricity (light, warm water, internet) from 9 am to 2 pm and from 7 pm to midnight the entire week. In other parts of Riobamba, electricity is cut off at exact opposite times. You can imagine how inconvenient this is for people at work, school, and home. Opinions on why these measures are needed differ. Some are convinced that it has a natural cause, as there ha S not rained for a long time. Others blame the government for not investing in hydroelectricity and thermoelectricity plants these last years, which leads to shortages now. Which story do you believe? I just read in the news that the government is experimenting with cloud seeding techniques to make it rain artificially. Curious to see how this will develop, hopefully it will start to rain normally..

A little update from Licto

By Maartje Claassens (Master students exchange programme, cohort of 2024-2025))

I promised to send an update every once in a while from Ecuador, and as I have already been here for more than a month, I think it is a good moment for the first one! My Ecuadorian adventure started in Quito, where I spent the first four weeks to learn Spanish. I stayed with Rosa and her son Matteo, who gave me an incredibly warm welcome in the country. Rosa, Matteo, and the Spanish teachers introduced me to Ecuadorian food and culture and told me a lot about its politics, history, economy, and geography. I realise now how valuable it was to slowly settle and learn more about the country before starting my thesis in Licto.

Last week, it was finally time to travel to Riobamba. I immediately noticed that Riobamba is completely different from Quito. Especially on Saturdays, campesinos from all over Chimborazo travel to the city to sell their produce at the market or buy some necessities in one of the hundreds of stores.

On Wednesday, Susana and Sebastián invited me to join them to a workshop in Guamote, the heart of the indigenous province. Susana and Sebastián organised workshops with communities in various places around Riobamba these past months, together with NGO Maquita. The workshops intend to learn more about the way water is organised in the communities and the problems they face. In the afternoon, the women also received leadership training from the NGO. It was so impressive to be in an indigenous province for the first time and to hear their stories! In these communities, most men and youngsters migrated to the US, so solely women were left to take care of the lands and the children. Interestingly, all leadership roles in these communities were still taken by men, as it is not common for women to take a leadership role yet. On Tuesday, we will return to Guamote to visit the four communities and to take some water and plant samples in order to measure the water quality in the area.

Today was the first day I visited Licto, finally! Susana invited me to visit the market and to explore the town. It was almost surreal to finally ´be´ in Licto, the place where I heard and read so much about these past months. I have noted that the people in Licto, or the countryside, are way more curious or open than the people in the cities, so I had lots of small talk today! After we visited the market, Susana introduced me to the president and administrator of the Junta. I was invited to attend the meeting of the water user organisation next week, which surely will be really interesting.

While I am super excited to dive into the relationships between the páramo and Licto communities, I am at the same time still a bit insecure about doing research here. I think the main reason for this is that I feel so different from the people here, which is confirmed by all the curious faces when I walk in the streets. There are barely any tourists in Ecuador due to the news of the past months, but especially in the countryside it seems like the people have almost never met a person like me. For this reason, I am so thankful for the help of Susana and Sebastián who have introduced me to the people and the area. I think knowing some locals helps a lot when building up trust in the beginning!

Other insecurities come from the fact that some things seem to be so obvious for an Ecuadorian but are completely new to me, and it takes time to understand them. For example: how does a Junta de Riego actually work? And what is the importance of reciprocity in Andean communities? Moreover, while my Spanish improved a lot it is sometimes difficult to express myself about complex topics in a nuanced way, or to understand people when they talk really fast or with an accent. In Guamote, the women almost only spoke Quichua, the indigenous language, which makes it even more complex!

However, I know that this is all part of the challenge and experience of doing a thesis in Ecuador and luckily I have almost three more months to learn and explore! This week, I will start with some first interviews in Licto and visit the páramo communities for the first time. Really curious about my upcoming time in the Andes!

Un abrazo,

Maartje (o Martha o Martita aqui)

Solidarity for those affected after devastating floods in Spain

The Riverhood and River Commons team expresses its solidarity with all the affected families, communities, and their partner organizations in Valencia and the neighbouring provinces, after the devastating floods, for which we attach this writing by the New Water Culture Foundation. 20241101FNCA-ante-las-inundaciones

Presentation by Hannah Porada on bridging environmental justice struggles in Guatemala and the Netherlands

On September 25, 2024, Hannah Porada presented a part of her PhD research related to bridging distant local environmental struggles during a webinar organized by the NEWAVE project. Guadalupe Garcia Prado and Nienke Busscher were the invited discussants.

This webinar explored the extractive transformations of territories and related resistance struggles across the Netherlands and Guatemala. Departing from a political ecology perspective and empirically grounded in her ongoing PhD research, Hannah Porada explored the cases of gas extraction in Groningen, The Netherlands, and the mining of construction materials in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala. How have extractive industries and their mining interventions transformed these territories? Why and how do affected populations and social movements contest these interventions, resist extractivism and defend their territories? Beyond the place-based perspective on the territorial struggles, Hannah also reflected on the idea of translocal justice bridges: How can translocal, cross-cultural and multi-scalar bridges be built across the place-based struggles against extractivism in The Netherlands and Guatemala? How can bridging support the territorial defense and resistance movements? What challenges and risk come with the building of translocal justice bridges? What reflections does bridging generate in terms of positionality and ethics?

The theme of bridging between environmental collectives is highly relevant for the Riverhood and River Commons projects. The presented reflections on the bridging event Hannah organized provide valuable insights for bridging activities in the River projects.

The link to the youtube video is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUAer_CYwfc

Breaking the ice: how visual research methods helped build trust between researcher and fishermen

Photo header: Chisala with the fishermen in initial focus group discussion

By: Chisala Lupele

When designing research methodologies, we consider different scenarios of our positionality, but in reality, building trust and navigating local dynamics is most complex. This reflection explores how a dabbed “city girl” overcame those challenges, fostering relationships with fishermen in remote Zambian communities by using Visual Research Methods. Through this approach, she not only collected data but also bridged cultural divides, highlighting the importance of trust and flexibility in effective research design.

The story unfolds on the white Kalahari sands, beneath which lie rich minerals, with the meandering Kwando River flowing above. Originating in Angola, the Kwando winds along Zambia’s border, through Namibia, and into the Linyanti Swamps near Botswana’s Okavango Delta. Despite its pristine nature, unsustainable fishing practices threaten its fish populations with declining targeted fish species.

To address this, a study engaged fishermen using semi-structured interviews and focus groups to understand their fishing practice by exploring their fishing history, methods, and relations among themselves and others. The researcher anticipated challenges due to her positionality—being young, female, and educated—but also encountered unexpected cultural dynamics. Early discussions with the fishermen in the data collection process revealed low trust, requiring flexibility to avoid scripted responses and build genuine trust and engagement.

Reflecting on her experiential knowledge of developing and using communication materials to aid informal learning in conservation awareness raising campaigns, the researcher used Photo Elicitation in form of Gallery Walk to overcome the cultural dynamics observed and gain trust among the fishermen. Photo Elicitation is a form of Visual Research Methods which uses photographs in interviews to stimulate deeper responses, allowing participants to express themselves beyond words, especially in informal settings. This method encourages emotional and experiential insights that traditional interviews might miss, as participants connect images to their personal knowledge, experiences, or the context in which they view them. This method coupled with Gallery walk technique which involves research participants walk around and discuss what is on display in a room; in this case being fish species and fishing methods and gear common to Zambian waters. Use of Visual Research Methods like Photo Elicitation have been sparsely used in natural resource governance studies.

The process

After using found images of fish species and fishing methods and gears used common to Zambian waters, they were displayed on the wall of the meeting room. As the fishermen began to flock into the room, they were encouraged to engage with the material on the wall while they waited for the other fishermen to come through. Soon, the room was filled with chuckles and laughter as they called one another towards what the researcher found was a lucrative fish species they often caught for sale.

Fish species and gears stack on the wall with fishermen observing before the meeting.

The session was called to motion and the researcher introduced the activity to be done for the morning while emphasising how they were experts of fish and fishing and that they were all there to learn from each other including the researcher. Soon rotation in the room began as discussion on each species and method began. Historical accounts of their experience catching certain fish species were shared, debate on presence of the fish species and admission to using illegal and unsustainable fishing practices were shared. Half way through the gallery walk, the fishermen at their own accord began to cluster the fish species according to their families from their experiential knowledge while fishing on the river. This was beautiful to watch as the researcher reflected back to the initial focus group discussion where scripted answers were given as feedback as opposed to this discussion a visual research method was used and the fishermen were free and engaged openly with the researcher.

Fishermen grouping the images during the gallery walk discussion.

The following day, the fishermen decided to bring some of the fish and fishing methods and gear talked about the previous day to show the researcher at their own accord.  When asked why they brought them and an elderly fisherman responded, “because you are a city girl, you haven’t seen this small fish before,” he said. After that, laughter ensued because yes, I was a city girl and I had never seen the fish before. For me this type of banter indicated how trust between myself and them was developing against all cultural dynamics existing between us.

Fish brought to the next meeting.

About the authour: Chisala Lupele is a PhD researcher in the River Commons Project. She is interested in multi-level governance, learning and inclusivity different actors in policy development. Her PhD study focuses on fishery practice, governance and learning at community, national and international level on the Kwando River in Southern Africa.

Riverine Rights Conference, Oslo Metropolitan University, 27-30 August 2024, Oslo

From 27 to 30 August 2024, Oslo Metropolitan University and partner institutes organized the “Riverine Rights Conference” to discuss the findings of the Riverine Rights project. It presented its 4-years research on rivers in Colombia, New Zealand and India that were given legal personhood. Together with invited experts, the conferenced critically discussed the successes and challenges of this legal novelty, placing it in a broader context. ‘How and why were rivers given rights, and what are their implications?’ The organizers invited Riverhood and River Commons PI Rutgerd Boelens to give a keynote lecture and join their debate on policies, philosophies, concepts, strategies and findings.

The conference discussions centered around river degeneration in times environmental crises. ‘Does legal personhood offer ways of securing the wellbeing of rivers and communities living with them? Can legal personhood and rights of nature be useful elsewhere? Is it applicable to a Norwegian context?’.

Axel Borchgrevink presented the core ideas of the Riverine Rights research project and central notions regarding ‘River persons, rights and ontologies’. John Andrew McNeish joined with a conference on ‘The political ecology of river rights’, placing the Colombian river cases in a broader power perspective. Case presentations followed such as ‘Beyond legal personhood for the Whanganui River’ (Miriama Cribb), ‘The constitutional marasmus of the Atrato River’ (Catalina Vallejo), ‘Rights of rivers in India’ (Bibhu Prasad Nayak), ‘Religious environmentalism in India’ (Rahul Ranjan), ‘Legal rights for rivers as a watershed’ (Elizabeth Macpherson), ‘Rights of waters in Norway?’ (Malene Brandshaug), ‘Sami participation in Norway’s Tana River governance’ (Camilla Brattland) and a reflection on Sami indigenous struggles against extractivism, for environmental rights and territorial sovereignty, by Eva Maria Fjellheim (Arctic University of Norway).  Grant Wilson (Earth Law Centre) explained the central strategies of the Rights of Nature movement; Rachel Sieder (CIESAS, Mexico City) placed the Rights of Nature in a conceptual and political framework to understand its inherent legal pluralism politics;  Rutgerd Boelens presented core notions and strategies of Riverhood and River Commons (‘Riverhood: Rivers and social justice movements. Knowledge battles, subject-making and countermapping’); and Mihnea Tanasescu challenged nature’s legal personhood presenting a political-philosophical understanding of Modernity. Interventions from multiple conference’s participants followed, from Oslomet, the Rights, Power and Accountability Research Cluster at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, and Norwegian and international academic, policy and civil society partners, engaging in lively and critical debates. See: www.oslomet.no/en/about/events/happens-rivers-legal-personhood.

Presentation at the RGS-IBG Annual International Conference 2024, London

From 27 to 30 August 2024, the RGS-IBG Annual International Conference 2024 was held in London under the theme ‘Mapping’. The conference explored ‘mapping in all its forms, in a world saturated with maps, from historical cartography to the newest technologies and practices of map-making’. Post-doctoral researcher Daniele Tubino presented a paper entitled ‘Engaging with onto-epistemological river struggles through counter-mapping’.The paper was led by Edward Huijbens and co-authored by Daniele, Sarita Bhagat, Bibiana Duarte Abadia, Juliana Forigua-Sandoval, Rutgerd Boelens, Jennifer C. Veilleux, and Leila Harris.

Daniele’s presentation looked at how academics and river grassroots movements used counter-mapping to work together on three case studies from Colombia, Ecuador and India and how mapping was used to support river struggles in these cases. Built on the concept of ‘riverhood’ this paper explores counter-mapping as an engaged activist research approach coming to terms with the state of being a river. Daniele discussed the counter-mapping in connection with rivers as hydrocommons and reflected through four interrelated ontologies —“river-as-ecosociety”, “river-as-territory”, “river-as-subject” and “river-as-movement” — that stand for different ways of understanding and engaging with rivers in different contexts, cultures and time scales. The presentation concluded by highlighting the transformative changes in the creation and maintenance of hydrocommons that can potentially be achieved through counter-mapping activities and their coalitions in the presented cases. Counter-mapping practices in these (and other cases related to Riverhood and River Commons) have the potential to foster multi-actor and multi-scalar dialogues that negotiate and articulate actionable proposals for river regeneration and socio-environmental justice. Such practices hold the possibility of redressing power structures, contributing to the reversal of widespread socio-environmental degradation of rivers, and countering developments of neoliberal enclosure.

Final reflection document Moving Rivers Seminar Manizales Colombia available

The final reflection document of the Moving Rivers Seminar Manizales Colombia is now available.

This document (in Spanish) reflects the main ideas and concepts presented during the presentations and debates in the plenary sessions and subsessions of the “Rivers in Motion” event.

The “Rivers in Motion” event was held in Manizales between March 11 and 15, 2024 and was organized by the projects Riverhood and River Commons of Wageningen University in alliance with: Water Justice Alliance, University of Caldas, Nodo Corporation, Natural Seeds Alliance, Kumanday Socio-Environmental Movement, Unitierra Manizales Collective Fabric and Southwestern Colombia, Tejinando Sentipensares (Weaving of walking pluriversities), CENSAT Agua Viva, and Association Broederlijk Delen.

International Seminar on Water Commoning Struggles at Wageningen University

On 5 July 2024, the Riverhood and River Commons teams organised an international seminar on “Water Commoning Struggles” following the PhD defence of Moritz Hofstetter. Moritz defended his thesis, entitled “Community, Markets, and Conviviality: A Political Ecology of Rural Water Supply”, in the morning, and the seminar took place in the afternoon.

The seminar included presentations from members of the jury committee Emilie Dupuits (University San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador) and Mary Galvin (Water Integrity Network, Berlin, and University of Johannesburg, South Africa); and from researchers from Wageningen University Jerry van de Berge, Jaime Hoogesteger, and Carlota Houart.

They talked about the commons, struggles for commoning, the role of youth in commoning processes, commons from a multispecies justice perspective, moving from Ecuador to South Africa to the EU and to more conceptual and political debates.

International Seminar on Water Commoning Struggles at Wageningen University, 5 July 2024

Riverhood and River Commons panels at #SLAS2024 Conference organised by CEDLA-University of Amsterdam

On the 2 July 2024, members of the Riverhood & River Commons teams presented their ongoing research in two panels on “Translocal Social Movements for Riverine Justice in Latin America”, as part of the annual conference of the Society for Latin American Studies organised by CEDLA – University of Amsterdam.

The panels were organised by Jaime Hoogesteger, Carlota Houart and Rutgerd Boelens and chaired by Carlota Houart and Rutgerd Boelens, and presenters included: Ana Maria Arbeláez Trujillo; Catalina Rey Hernández; Meike Klarenbeek; Bibiana Duarte-Abadía; Sarah Kelly and long-time Mapuche-Williche collaborator Gladys Quintul; Carlota Houart; Lotte De Jong; and Jaime Hoogesteger.

Together they discussed topics ranging from local and trans-local river justice movements to resistance against hydropower development, legal mobilization, counter-mapping, dominant and counter-hegemonic river imaginaries, river commons, engaged research, and others.

PhD defence of Nick Bourguignon on the multi-scalar and multi-dimensional politics and contradictions of territorial transformations induced by Inter-Basin Water Transfers

On the 24 April I successfully defended my PhD dissertation at the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA-UAB). The dissertation explored the multi-scalar and multi-dimensional politics and contradictions of territorial transformations induced by Inter-Basin Water Transfers (IBWTs), particularly the Tagus-Segura Aqueduct in Spain. Taking the format of a scalar journey, the dissertation explores IBWT impacts worldwide, before descending into the crafting of different forms of hegemonic and counterhegemonic territories in the Tagus-Segura Aqueduct, the fabrication of irrigator subjects co-creating these territories, and the ethical implications of water-based more-than-human relationships and co-becoming from my own perspective as subject, inhabitant, and researcher. The chapters making up the dissertation are published as stand alone scientific articles or book chapters, aside from one chapter currently in peer review. I was accompanied and supported at the defence committee by my co-supervisors Sergio Villamayor Tomás (ICTA-UAB) and Rutgerd Boelens (Wageningen University), family and friends, as well as online by colleagues and mentors from the networks I am part of, the WEGO-ITN project and the Riverhood project. The defence committee consisted of Carles Sanchis Ibor from the Universitat Politècnica de València, David Saurí from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, and Leila Harris from the University of British Columbia, and I am thankful to them for their questions and patience for what was a very animated and enjoyable session.

Online lecture Rivers, Territories and Power. Water Justice Movements and Counter-mapping to Bridge River Struggles

The faculty of Italian Studies and Environmental Humanities at the University of St.Gallen is pleased to invite you to its Spring 2024 guest lecture:

Rutgerd Boelens: Rivers, Territories and Power. Water Justice Movements and Counter-mapping to Bridge River Struggles

Tuesday, May 14, 12:15 – 1:45 pm CEST
Online lecture: please register in advance here: https://lnkd.in/deHAJdpx

Mega-damming, pollution and depletion endanger rivers worldwide. Modernist imaginaries of ordering ‘unruly waters and humans’ have become cornerstones of hydraulic-bureaucratic and capitalist development. They separate hydro/social worlds, sideline river-commons cultures, and deepen socio-environmental injustices. However, myriad new water justice movements (NWJMs) proliferate: rooted, disruptive, transdisciplinary, multi-scalar coalitions that deploy alternative river–society ontologies, bridge South–North divides, and translate river-enlivening practices from local to global and vice-versa. In this guest lecture, Rutgerd Boelens presents a collective framework that conceptualizes ‘riverhood’ to engage with NWJMs and river commoning initiatives. It suggests four interrelated ontologies, situating river socionatures as arenas of material, social and symbolic co-production: ‘river-as-ecosociety’, ‘river-as-territory’, ‘river-as-subject’, and ‘river-as-movement’. Boelens further examines the Traveling Rivers initiative, linking grassroots activists, engaged academia and river commoning struggles through counter-mapping. Making rivers actively travel among six river conflict arenas in Colombia and Ecuador, the initiative seeks new grass-rooted understandings capable of strengthening ‘rivers of resistance’ that break away from river grabbing and imposed status quo river governance.

WUR events highlight River Commons and Travelling Rivers

On 6 March 2024, PhD Carlota Houart had the opportunity to present the River Commons project at the ‘Wageningen Impact for Sustainable Futures’ event, which brought together several outstanding projects at Wageningen University that have been awarded INREF grants. These projects stand out for their transdisciplinary approaches, integrating academia and society in innovative ways and multiple areas of knowledge. In her speech, Carlota highlighted how the River Commons project has been building transdisciplinary bridges between academia and social movements, environmental organisations, artists, and activist groups to work together to defend rivers. She also highlighted some of the key strengths of the project, such as the use of alternative and creative methodologies to co-create actionable knowledge with grassroots initiatives around rivers for social and environmental impact.

Carlota Houart presenting the River Commons project

Also on 8 March, post-doc Daniele Tubino represented the Travelling Rivers initiative (part of the Riverhood and River Commons projects) at the WUR Research Award in the Transdisciplinary Research of the Year category. In her pitch, Daniele highlighted how the Travelling Rivers initiative follows a radical transdisciplinary path by building entirely on the ideas and knowledge of riverine communities. Travelling Rivers makes ideas about rivers travel and does so through counter-maps created with the help of local artists, that represent alternative visions that can heal our rivers. As she highlighted, these maps integrate diverse knowledge, connect movements around the world, and amplify their power by enabling new transnational networks of solidarity that can influence the creation of new policies for rivers.

Daniele Tubino representing the Travelling Rivers transdisciplinary initiative

The International Meeting “Rios en movimiento”: interweaving riverside communities, social movements and academia

By Ana Arbelaez Trujillo

The global nature of the dynamics that affect rivers, bringing many of them close to ecological collapse and provoking political, cultural and socioeconomic crises, makes it essential to scale up and broaden place-based river struggles. Therefore, the international meeting of the Riverhood and River Commons projects was a space to exchange learnings about the problems of rivers worldwide, the main struggles, care practices and demands of those who inhabit them.

This meeting aimed to approach the rivers and their movements from different perspectives and provide a space for conversation, allowing close interaction among riverside communities, social movements, and academia. To this end, diverse art expressions played a central role. We used diverse methodologies for weaving conversations during the event, including audiovisuals, artistic pieces, river walks, alternative cartographies, songs, and academic presentations. Furthermore, we had a permanent art exhibition with the work of the collectives “NaaK Memorias del Agua”, “Entre Ríos” and “Orika” at the creative gallery Bestiario.

During the event, we also visited several of the micro-watersheds of the Kumanday bio-geo-territory: Cuenca Taguambí, Cuenca Quebrada Olivares, and Cuenca Río Chinchiná. These territorial visits were an invitation to understand the river as much more than a continuous stream of water flowing into the sea and an opportunity to learn about the work of local collectives such as Eco-finca La Soledad, Senderos de Luz, Líderes Alto del Castillo, Comunativa, Huerta Urbana NAKSI, and Tierra Libre.

The International Meeting “Rios en movimiento” was organised as one of the knowledge exchange activities of the Riverhood and River Commons research projects and had the support of Alianza Justicia Hídrica, Universidad de Caldas, Centro Cultural Universitario Rogelio Salmina, Corporación Nodo – NaaK Memorias del agua, Movimiento Socio-ambiental Kumanday, Natural Seeds Alliance, Tejido de Colectivos Unitierra Manizales y Suroccidente Colombiano,  Tejinando Sentipensares (Tejido de pluriveresidades de a pie), Asociación Broederlijk Delen y CENSAT Agua Viva.

 

Los ríos sirvieron de afluente para su defensa y cuidado en Manizales

The “Ríos en Movimiento” International Conference that took place in Manizales, Colombia, from 12 to 15 March 2024, bringing together academics and river activists from all over the world, was widely publicised by the Colombian media, check out the article entitled “Los ríos sirvieron de afluente para su defensa y cuidado en Manizales”, published by the newspaper “La Patria”.

Ríos en movimiento convocó a organizaciones, universidades y grupos de investigación que trabajan alrededor del agua, de su cuidado, de verla como ríos comunes, en movimiento e, inclusive, como movimiento político y como movimiento vivo.

En total participaron representantes de 12 países, incluido Colombia, provenientes de América, Europa y África. Ellos realizaron tres salidas de campo a la quebrada Olivares, al río Chinchiná y a la cuenca Taguambi para compartir experiencias y analizar los procesos realizados en esos sectores.”

Check out the full article here!

Todas las luchas, todos los ríos, todas las vidas

The International Conference “Ríos en Movimiento” has been organised as one of the knowledge exchange activities of the Riverhood and River Commons research projects. The meeting took place in Manizales, Colombia, from 12 to 15 March 2024. Check out the article “Todas las luchas, todos los ríos, todas las vidas” about the event, published by the Popular Training Institute.

By Daniela Sánchez Romero, 19 march, 2024

Entender el río como cuna ecosistémica, como bien común, como movimiento, como territorio o como un sujeto poseedor de derechos, han sido algunas maneras en las que organizaciones sociales, académicas y comunidades reconocen el papel de los ríos en los ecosistemas. 

Por eso, más de 100 organizaciones y entidades académicas de países como Colombia, México, Ecuador, India, España, Suráfrica y Zambia, tuvieron un espacio de diálogo y encuentro de saberes en el evento internacional Ríos en movimiento, impulsado por los proyectos de investigación Riverhood y River Commons.

A través de diálogos desde un enfoque de ecología política y justicia hídrica, estos proyectos de investigación tienen como propósito motivar conversaciones y ejercicios de reflexión alrededor de los movimientos por la justicia del agua para una gobernanza equitativa y sostenible, y el apoyo a iniciativas de cogobernanza fluvial y sistemas fluviales socioecológicos sostenibles.”

Click here to check out the full article!

“Diary of Travelling Rivers” has won the international Impact Docs Award

The “Diary of Travelling Rivers” has won the international Impact Docs Award. The Impact Docs Awards are part of the prestigious Global Film Awards family and are an international awards competition designed specifically for documentary filmmakers. Its focus is to recognise and promote documentaries that address pressing global issues and engage audiences through compelling storytelling.

Walking Along Rivers, Feeling Through Infrastructures

“Walking Along Rivers, Feeling Through Infrastructures” is a blog written by Laura Betancur Alarcón (Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems-IRI THESys at Humboldt Universität zu Berlin) and Ana María Arbeláez-Trujillo (Water Resources Management Group at Wageningen University and Research), published by Engagement, the anthropology and environment society.

On her way to the La Miel River banks, Isaura walks across the mountain. Lying down as tree steam, she sees the 6-kilometer pipe that transports the river waters to the powerhouse of the hydroelectric plant. She can’t swim in the river anymore: a large tube carries a large part of its water, diminishing its flow. Also on foot but in the riverbanks of a dry forest valley, Pedro looks for a possible port to embark on the “piece of river” they have left. It is a 14-kilometer stretch of the Magdalena River left between two large dams. While he searches, the river expands and retracts with the rhythms of the energy power plants. Isaura and Pedro seek the rivers’ current in territories fragmented by infrastructure.  Following their footsteps, we travel along the banks and valleys of two rivers in the Colombian Andes. Ana walks with Isaura through the upper part of the La Miel River in the town of Bolivia, department of Caldas. The journey takes place around the influence area of the run-of-the-river hydroelectric project ‘El Edén’ -built in 2013- which partially diverted the river’s waters. Laura walks with Pedro along the upper Magdalena River, where the Betania Dam (1987) and the El Quimbo Dam (2015) were built in the department of Huila.  Large physical transformations caused by hydropower on rivers have been the focus of academic inquiries. But what about those daily experiences in the territories inhabited by ribereños and campesinos? How do they feel about those transformations?

Tiny pieces of water -in the form of fog- cover the mountains in the East of Caldas and linger over the landscape for a few hours. Photo by Ana María Arbeláez-Trujillo.

Check out the full text here.

Coordinator for the creation of a doctoral network

Check out this job offer!

Eucor – The European Campus is a trinational consortium of five universities in the Upper Rhine region, which is a border area between Germany, France, and Switzerland. Its purpose is to build a scientific space without walls or borders and with international influence (www.eucor-uni-org). In this rich academic environment, an interdisciplinary doctoral network in the field of river landscape management is currently being established. We are looking for a coordinator for this project.

Main activities:
The coordinator will support the steering committee in:
• Strengthening interdisciplinary methods and solutions for the transfer of science to the political sphere;
• Designing, organizing, and documenting cross-border workshops in cooperation with local partners;
• Coordinating the drafting of a proposal for a European doctoral network.

Associated activities:
• Supporting activities aimed at strengthening international scientific collaborations on sustainable development of hydrosystems within the framework of the EUCOR Chair “Water and Sustainability”.

Fixed-term contract: 14 months

Start: as soon as possible
Statut: Contractual Agent

Corps: Ingénieur d’études (Research Engineer)
Contact(s) for information about the position: Prof.Dr.Karl Matthias Wantzen – kmwantzen@unistra.fr

For more info, please click here.

Weaving connections between Wageningen students and Andean communities

By Susana Zavala

The Environmental Justice in Practice course at Wageningen University proposes an approach that involves students in practical cases of competition for natural resources. In this sense, together with Sebastian, we will look at the case of the Páramo (highland) communities and the Licto (lowland) communities, who use water from the Páramo to irrigate their lands, without any retaliation or sense of reciprocity. Six students therefore set out to develop strategies to rebuild relations between the highland and lowland communities, addressing the complexities and dynamics of the case.

Conversation with students of the Environmental Justice in Practice course.

With the brief introduction we gave in the first meeting about the “twin rivers” and their actors, the paramo communities integrated in the ASARATY association (upper zone) and the irrigation communities that make up the Guarguallá Licto Irrigation Board (lower zone), the students drew up a report and presented the case as they understood it. Throughout this process, we held discussions to provide additional information and clarification. These dialogues focused on crucial aspects such as: the essential characteristics of the páramo ecosystem, its population and family livelihoods, which are based on alpaca breeding; the history of access to irrigation water; the initial relationship between the communities of the lower and upper zones; the changes in production resulting from the introduction of irrigation in the beneficiary communities; and the acquisition of land in the Molobog community.

However, we believe that these meetings with the students could be enriched with a complementary approach, specifically through interviews with the leaders of the organisations present in the upper and lower communities of Chimborazo, Ecuador.
In this context, we took the initiative to establish communication with the leaders of both the moorland communities (high zone) and the irrigation communities (low zone). The communication process began with the exchange of respectful greetings such as “Good morning, comrade” and responses such as “Good morning, miss”. It is worth noting that in this effort to connect, we received calls even in the early hours of the morning, demonstrating the time difference and the dedication of our colleagues to communicate and hear their voices.
Despite these minor setbacks, we were able to successfully schedule interviews with three key leaders in the context studied: Alfonso Guamán, head of the Molobog community and Licto parish; Galo Bonilla, president of the Guarguallá-Licto Irrigation Board; and Rafael Ushca, head of ASARATY, the representative organisation of the Guarguallá marshlands.

The first interview took place on Tuesday with Mr Alfonso Guamán. We took advantage of the internet connection to remove geographical barriers and allow instant communication. Although the students were able to meet Alfonso, they needed the support of Catalina (a student from Wageningen) to overcome the language barrier. The interview started with a general question: “This gave Alfonso the opportunity to express himself freely and share information about life before the arrival of the irrigation water, the process of land acquisition, and the changes the community experienced with access to water and land. This first approach made it possible to introduce the dynamics of the relationship with the highland communities.

Alfonso noted that at the beginning of the irrigation project there was a positive relationship between the communities. However, he noted that this relationship had deteriorated over time due to constant changes in leadership and the assumption of roles by individuals unfamiliar with the irrigation system and the struggle for water. Despite this deterioration, Alfonso was optimistic that there is a good chance of reaching harmonious agreements and rebuilding the relationship between the upland and lowland communities.

The following day, the students met with Galo Bonilla, who enriched the process with his experience and knowledge as the current president of the Junta de Riego. They then met with Rafael Ushca, who provided a unique perspective on environmental management in the páramo. It is important to highlight and express our sincere appreciation for the time given to the three leaders, as their contributions were fundamental in enriching the understanding of the case.

The colloquia and interviews with leaders have given the students in the Environmental Justice in Practice course a broad perspective on the history, dynamics and breakdown of inter-community relations between the highlands and the lowlands, and the challenges of managing their natural resources. This insight is reflected in the first outline of the students’ proposal, which consists of a collaborative timeline of the history and relationships between the two communities. They also plan to develop an exchange plan between the communities to deepen their mutual knowledge of their respective territories.

Moreover, this active and collaborative dialogue extended to other instances, as we presented and discussed the case with Masters students at Wageningen University, and they showed a marked interest in engaging with the issue.

Meeting with Master students from Wageningen University.